FUKUSHIMA. LOOK WITH YOUR EYES (and live blogging)
The world thinks of nuclear power, only the 'central Italy defends
Nuclear Europe' s second thoughts. Only the 'central Italy defends. Japanese wake of the tragedy, the fear of nuclear shakes Europe. Chancellor Angela Merkel has decided to suspend the extension of the operational life of the 16 civilian nuclear reactors still operating in Germany, Switzerland has blocked the application process for authorizing the construction of three new sites, Austria calls for a review at Europe. Vienna, in fact, 'exit from' Atomic Energy in 1978 and now refuses to be surrounded by power plants of neighboring countries. Even in Belgium are reviewing the timing of exit from nuclear power. Even in France, the European country most convinced of the rightness of the choice of civilian nuclear power, doubts and fears spread. Environmentalists have called for a referendum on the future of the atom. The Polish thoughts can influence the future choices of the other democracies of Central and Eastern Europe, to support their economic expansion since the fall of the Soviet empire, have focused more deeply on the nuclear issue, as the czech Republic and Slovakia.
The scenario of a nuclear and a farewell to the fastest possible conversion of energy production in the Old Continent, renewable energy from the atom, seems to become more and more reality. In the U.S., where you do not build power plants since 1979, after the 'accident at Three Mile Island, and where President Obama could count on bipartisan support on an' opportunity 'to focus more on nuclear power and build 20 new power stations are back doubts arose after 1979. And even convinced supporters of the nuclear advocate a pause for reflection. In Italy, however, the government decided to continue its nuclear policy.
Minister 's Environment Stefania Prestigiacomo, so' as well as his colleague Paolo Romani, and that ' Head of the department of Economic Development, which will manage 'the business (in the sense of business?) Nuclear, said that asking to change plans in the wake of the incidents in Japan and' macabre''speculation.'' Prestigiacomo He reiterated that the incentives for solar will decrease, and added that the money will be spent instead for future nuclear power stations to be placed where the seismic risk and 'child. If there were to be happy there would be little to laugh out loud. do not know where the reactors will be installed Italians. The government plays hide and seek. Only two years at 'start of work and and' still at range of hypotheses that place where the reactors were already 'before their decommissioning: Caorso (Piacenza) and Montalto di Castro (northern Lazio). Then perhaps, in Monfalcone, Chioggia, Ostuni. do not know where else to go then the 80 000 cubic meters of legacy waste from past experience, even if Sogin, the companies' government responsible for radioactive waste management costs to 'purse of € 400 million to' year. Enel, which should handle the four nuclear power stations, not 'most' of the safe choice. Why '? Why
'next-generation EPR power stations, which should buy from France's EDF, cost dear, more 'than five billion. Enel is looking for this model a more'''old''but less expensive. More 'older and less expensive?! security? Or be 'this will be' certified by 'Agency for Nuclear Safety. Yes ', the one presided over by' oncologist Umberto Veronesi. What could easily sleep in the room with the radioactive waste 'cause there's no risk. In fact, for years he spends his holidays in Montalto di Castro Caorso or in the middle of the tanks where they are stored the''beneficial''slag. Here we are ridiculous. L 'Agency for Nuclear Safety is not established and have funds, and not a regulation and 'without a general manager. The components of 'Agency, in addition to Veronese, the magistrate Stefano Dambruoso, the vice-Stefano Laporta former Chef de Cabinet of the Ministry for Equal Opportunities', the scientist and Professor Maurizio Cumo Marco Ricotti, to discuss the foundations that will allow the operation of' Agency, gather around a table in a bar. The only two I know of the nuclear Maurizio Cumo, professor of nuclear facilities at Sapienza University in Rome and member of the National Academy of Sciences, known as the XL, one of the leading experts in the world of nuclear plants, and Marco Ricotti, nuclear engineer Professor of Nuclear Plants at the Politecnico di Milano. The rest, as my grandmother would say,''good people''.
The Government goes on in his choice. Granite. Regardless of Fukushima and the rest of the world. Heedless of the fact that absolute security will not exist 'and never unmindful of the fact that nobody in the world has yet to resolve the waste disposal issue. Does not exist in the world, in fact, a storage site for waste in the long term. Even the Americans and the French have had to give up. Now they build in Finland. But we are certain to guarantee a place for 100,000 years is not issued radioactivity 'and where no one will have' access, unless Professor Veronesi loves to go cross-country skiing just in Finland. The fact 'that the economic interests related to nuclear power in Italy are very strong. Consider that the only forum for the nuclear, chaired by Chicco Testa (promoter of the referendum in 1987 against the 'Atomic Energy Agency), famous for leaving his son to' inside of a nuclear power plant rather than 'buy a scooter, chosen by the greatest risks a power plant, has launched an advertising campaign by the pro nuclear cost of six million euro. Paid by whom? From: Westinghouse, Enel, Areva, EDF, Ansaldo Nuclear, all companies interested in the business of nuclear power plants. Pro nuclear and 'also the Aspen Institute (Abbott and Enrico Letta, Tremonti, Marcegaglia, Prodi, Elkann, to quote the more 'known) financed by Eni, Enel, Rai, Mediaset, Sky, Telecom, Fiat, Impregilo, Siemens. One consideration: a German study showed that children living within five kilometers from a nuclear plant have 120 per cent more 'of leukemia and 60 percent in most' of bone tumors. It 's this' heritage' that we leave to our children and our grandchildren and generations to come?
I would not be evil one, and 'if there was a''clique''for nuclear power? How Andreotti says:''to think the worst is a sin, but often simply guesses.'' ''So ... 'and' if I please!''And''Against Information!'' recommended links
Nth nuclear accident, no more 's nuclear case in Italy
Written on 15/03/11 at 20:30 in Nuclear Central Fukushima, Europe, Italy, Agency for Nuclear Safety
0 comments:
Post a Comment